Australia's deployment of 500 extra troops to Iraq this week, was so low-key that most of the nation didn't even notice them leaving. Rest assured this was not an accident. Tradition normally requires that all military personnel going overseas first be bombarded with long boring speeches by grandstanding politicians, invariably against a backdrop of fighter jets or heavy armor, thereby hopefully reflecting a macho military image on the limp-wristed politicians in question.

            Let us be honest here, the politicians  really need the macho reflection, because without it they are nothing. Though in the distant past our leaders were selected by their own people on the basis of personal charisma and courage on the battlefield, they are nowadays selected on the basis of their personal willingness to prostitute themselves for a bunch of moneylenders in New York City.

            You only have to look for yourself: America is ruled by George W. Bush, an intellectually challenged rich kid, who managed to avoid being killed in Vietnam by joining (and then deserting) the Air National Guard.  Britain is ruled by Tony Blair, a cross-eyed traitor who continually strives to abolish the Monarchy, because he personally wants to be King and live in Buckingham palace. Australia? Well now, Australia is ruled by John Winston Howard ("President Winston" to his close friends), who, in his permanent delusional state, already believes he is King of the Southern Hemisphere.

            Long after all three dictators are finally led to the gallows for high treason and war crimes, history will acknowledge Iraq as the final deadly political and military trap designed to draw them onto the guns of those they had continually abused, tortured and murdered since 1990. Indeed, even longer than that, if you also include Britain's mustard gassing of the Iraqis back in the 1920s - the first 'police' use of 'Weapons of Mass Destruction'.

           "The RAF was first ordered to Iraq to quell Arab and Kurdish and Arab uprisings, to protect recently discovered oil reserves, to guard Jewish settlers in Palestine and to keep Turkey at bay. Some mission, yet it had already proved itself an effective imperial police force in both Afghanistan and Somaliland (today's Somalia) in 1919-20. British and US forces have been back regularly to bomb these hubs of recalcitrance ever since...

            Iraqi bombing raids, "increased after 1923 when Squadron Leader Arthur Harris - the future hammer of Hamburg and Dresden, whose statue stands in Fleet Street in London today,  took command of 45 Squadron. Adding bomb-racks to Vickers Vernon troop car riers, Harris more or less invented the heavy bomber as well as night "terror" raids. Harris did not use gas himself - though the RAF had employed mustard gas against Bolshevik troops in 1919, while the army had gassed Iraqi rebels in 1920 'with excellent moral effect'.

           "Churchill was particularly keen on chemical weapons, suggesting they be used 'against recalcitrant Arabs as an experiment'. He dismissed objections as 'unreasonable'. 'I am strongly in favour of using poisoned gas against uncivilised tribes - [to] spread a lively terror.'  In today's terms, 'the Arab' needed to be shocked and awed. A good gassing might well do the job."       

            Returning to the year 2005, it is abundently obvious to all with access to basic Middle East intelligence,  that Iraq is now a death trap for illegal invaders of any persuasion, and regardless  of whether they are carrying heavy machine guns or merely "protecting Japanese reconstruction engineers", which is Australia's hopeful though completely illegal excuse for entry.

            Sending these Australian 'Diggers" to defend the descendants of Japanese troops who brutally tortured Australian troops on the Burma Railway, is not only ironic, but also downright insulting.  In Australia today there are several hundred elderly survivors of those Japanese war crimes, but the Australian Returned Services League (roughly similar to the American Veterans Alliance), is keeping its mouth tightly shut on the matter.

            This silence by the Australian RSL has been generated mostly because its ruling executive is no longer capable of objective military analysis, having to a large extent been 'brainwashed' by political cretins in Canberra, and by their bosses in New York. Nowadays the politically-correct stance is that the Japanese are 'honorable trade partners', rather than a bunch of barbarians who beat our unarmed soldiers to death just a few years ago.

            In like manner, New York media spin doctors have taken the most advanced secular country in the Middle East (Iraq), and reinvented it in the image of the old 1920s propaganda version preferred by Winston Churchill and the Jewish invaders of Palestine. Once again, "'I am strongly in favour of using poisoned gas against uncivilised tribes - [to] spread a lively terror."

            Do not be deceived into thinking that this deliberate two-stage psywar process might be a mistake, or the product of faulty memory, for it is neither. This media manipuilation and political control over loyal  soldiers has only one objective - to undermine the collective and individual military will, until these highly trained armed men are either rendered harmless to their own treasonous politicians, or discarded as forgotten corpses on a foreign battlefield.

           Think about this very carefully people, think about it. Do you really believe that a mere 500 extra Australian servicemen will make the slightest difference, in an illegal invasion where since 2003 the Republican Guard and Mehdi Army combined have already managed to liberate more than thirty Iraqi towns and cities, and contain more than 120,000 American and British troops within their heavily fortified defensive firebases?  No, of course it will not.

             These 500 Australian servicemen are sacrificial pawns, being sent to deliberately test the resolve (or otherwise) of the Australian people, before New York attempts to send more than 20,000 American servicemen to cover the tactical withdrawal of the Jews from Palestine.  So those American readers who might prefer to mutter "What have a few hundred Australian soldiers got to do with me?" had better sit up straight and pay attention.  

                        

 

 

            So far, this experiment in psychological manipulation has gone very well for New York, with barely a murmer of dissent from the Australian military or civilian public. In part this has been managed by careful media presentation, and in part by diverting public attention elsewhere.

           A prime example of the latter is a young Australian woman called Schapelle Corby, deliberately framed  as a 'drug runner' by Australian officials, who planted  4.1 kilograms of low-grade Queensland Marijuana in her hold baggage when she changed aircraft at Sydney. The full story of Ms Corby's contrived ordeal will be covered in a separate report, but  suffice to say here that the emotionally-supercharged scenes of Schapelle from the court in Bali, have kept most Australian television viewers captivated for weeks - certainly for long enough to deflect serious attention away from the plight of the 500 Australian servicemen.

            At the same time, this orchestrated Australian Government sting has helped to increase Australian public anger towards generic "Muslim Indonesia". It matters not that the main religion on the island of Bali is Hindu Dharma, which arrived with the spread of Hinduism through Sumatra and Java during the 11th century. Most Australians do not know about this, and thus follow the general media disinformation directive that all Indonesian citizens are "Muslim Terrorists", with this directive borrowed in turn from New York's insane quasi-religious guidelines for the fictitious 'War on Terror'.

            Careful media presentation of the 500 troops has limited the television exposure of political figures during the deployment, which simply means that where Australian politicians have actually been exposed on camera with the departing 2nd Cavalry, the photos could have been taken while talking to any Australian troops, anywhere and at any time.

            One excellent example of this classic  covert approach is the very fleeting appearance of Prime Minister-President Winston, bound by Australian tradition to say "Farewell" to the departing servicemen. Normally this is conducted with enormous vice-regal pomp and ceremony, with the diminutive Winston waving a silk handkerchief at the aircraft steps, or on the dockside.

            Not this time around. On this single occasion of potential mass pawn sacrifice, Winston's media minders ensured that his "Farewell" was a very low key affair, amounting only to him mingling with the soldiers and their families at an informal barbeque.  It could have  been anywhere, and there wasn't an aircraft or ship within sight.

           What happens next is largely in the hands of fate, but have no doubt this manipulative process will be viewed anxiously from New York every step of the way. The Jewish State is in its final death throes, and American soldiers will have to be deployed to save the illegal Jewish occupiers of Palestine from a 'fate worse than death'. It is a tricky time politically, with no one really sure whether the sacrificial 'blocking' American troops will go to Palestine as ordered to save the poor Jews, or perhaps turn their guns on Capitol Hill instead.

            On present performance, and taking into account the stealth deployement of Australia's 2nd Cavalry, it seems likely that American troops will obey this final illegal command when it comes, and throw themselves onto the Syrian and Iraqi guns, in much the same way that Secret Service agents are required to die on command, in order to protect a 'more important' American President.

            Naturally the American deployment to Palestine will need a decoy to divert public attention, which was media-managed for the Australian 2nd Cavalry deployment by use of the luckless Schapelle Corby in Bali. But, with enormous foresight or out of sheer desperation, New York already has its American decoy in place - Iran.

             For month after relentless month, the media has been prattling on about America and Israel 'attacking' Iran, when the reality is that neither country has the men or equipment needed to do so. Not only that, there are now at least five regional powers which have been equipped with the unstoppable Mach 2.9 Russian anti-ship 'Onyx' missile, or its identical Indian twin, the 'BrahMos".

            In less than two years, these seemingly insignificant missiles have reduced the effective imperial might of the United States Navy to zero. Nowadays any 91,000 ton American aircraft carrier can be sunk by only two of these conventional warheads, which have never been known to miss.

           Put another way, the attacking American aircraft carrier would need to get within aircraft strike distance of Iran, but the Iranians would only need to get within 220 kilometres of the carrier to launch their Onyx missiles and sink her. No admiral is going to take risks like that, regardless of what George W. Bush and the Wall Street bankers might order.

           So why use Iran as a decoy if you have no intention of attacking the country? The answer appears to be quite simple. When the time comes for the 'Attack on Iran', Ariel Sharon will probably invite the American military to use Jewish airfields and naval bases in Palestine as staging posts.

            Now then, will it be the fault of the poor Jews if (say) 20,000 American troops should be in transit through Palestine for Iran when Ariel and his cronies suddenly need to get out of the place fast? Good heavens, no, to suggest such a thing would be "anti-Semitism" at its very worst, and probably punishable as such under American Law. Those of you who think this scenario is not possible, should examine the case of the USS Liberty more closely.

            Until that time comes, we can only monitor the progress of the Australian 2nd cavalry in Iraq, bearing in mind the usual New World Order obsession with committing atrocites (or at least starting them) on special anniversaries. Insofar as it is possible to glean information from behind a suffocating security blanket in Australia, the 2nd Cavalry is due to cross the border from Kuwait into Iraq five days from now on April 25, which is also Australia's most important military anniversary, known as "ANZAC Day".

            On that day in 1915, exactly ninety years earlier and on the orders of then Imperial power Great Britain, Australian and New Zealand troops landed at Anzac Cove on the Gallipoli peninsula.  Britain had allocated the most dangerous landing ground of all the the ANZACS, and April 25 thus marks the beginning of the biggest military defeat Australia has ever suffered in any war so far, through no fault of its own.

            Nowadays Australia is unquestionably subservient to Imperial power America, and I for one, can only hope that ANZAC history is not allowed to repeat itself in Iraq.          

 

 

Down some cold field in a world unspoken

the young men are walking together, slim and tall,

and though they laugh to one another, silence is not broken;

there is no sound however clear they call.

 

They are speaking together of what they loved in vain here,

but the air is too thin to carry the things they say.

They were young and golden, but they came on pain here,

and their youth is age now, their gold is grey.

 

Yet their hearts are not changed, and they cry to one another,

'What have they done with the lives we laid aside?

Are they young with our youth, gold with our gold, my brother?

Do they smile in the face of death, because we died?'

 

Down some cold field in a world uncharted

the young seek each other with questioning eyes.

They question each other, the young, the golden hearted,

of the world that they were robbed of in their quiet paradise.